Comparative Market Analysis
212 Cartwheel Bend #135 — The Vineyards at Rough Hollow

Prepared for Sally Kim | Foreman Property Group · eXp Realty Luxury

Sale & Lease Strategy — July 2026

A dual-track analysis: what the market will pay to buy, and what it will pay to lease — with a clear-eyed read on the backyard and how it moves both numbers.

The Property at a Glance

212 Cartwheel Bend #135 — a 2017 Village Builders residence in the lock-and-leave section of The Vineyards at Rough Hollow.

Size & Layout

3 bedrooms · 2.5 baths · 1,736 sq ft · two-story · 2-car garage

Community & Location

HOA $525/mo · Lake Travis ISD · 25 minutes to downtown Austin

Purchase History

Purchased December 2020 at $380,000 — 110 days on market, closed 5% under original list

View Status

No view — the open outlook at purchase has since been built out (see next slide)

Without a view to set it apart, this unit competes head-to-head on price, condition, and presentation. The strategy below is built around that reality.

The Section Has Changed Since 2020

Two shifts have occurred since Sally purchased — both material to how we price and position.

The View Is Gone

At purchase there was no rear neighbor and an open outlook. A home has since been built behind the unit, closing off that outlook. The premium that helped justify the 2020 price no longer exists — the unit now prices as a no-view interior condo.

The Drainage Problem

The right-side neighbor regraded their yard. Stormwater and silt now track across the subject's rear yard, which is why replacement turf has struggled to establish. The cause is external and documentable — important for both disclosure and buyer conversations.

The Backyard: The Single Most Important Lever

The rear yard, as it sits, places the home in the bottom tier on presentation. In a lock-and-leave section this dense with direct competition, and with no view to fall back on, that is the one thing we cannot carry into the market.

Recommendation: install new sod before going live — for sale or for lease.

  • Cost is modest (low single-thousands); the discount a distressed-looking yard invites is materially larger.
  • A clean, green yard moves the home from "needs work" to "move-in ready" in the buyer's first thirty seconds.

One honest caveat: because the adjacent regrade continues to push runoff and silt across the yard, sod alone may not hold long-term without a drainage correction (a shallow swale or French drain to redirect the neighbor's water). We recommend sod now to compete; we advise Sally that a drainage fix is what makes it permanent.

The Comparable Set — How We Selected

We benchmarked against the tightest possible set: 3-bedroom units in The Vineyards / Rough Hollow lock-and-leave section, in the subject's size band (roughly 1,700–1,850 sq ft), separating what has closed from what is currently competing.

Closed Sales

Tell us what buyers have paid. These establish the ceiling and the floor of what the market has actually accepted.

Active Listings

Tell us what the subject must beat to sell. In this market, actives govern the entry price — not closeds.

The Near-Twin

We flagged the one near-identical unit that removes most of the guesswork — same size, same vintage, same no-view position.

Closed Comparable Sales

Recent closings, subject size band (3 bed, ~1,700–1,840 sq ft):

The four view units cleared $460,000–$469,000. The one no-view closing (433 #89) landed at $454,500 — but it is a 2022 build. Our 2017 unit is older and, critically, is still being weighed against a much softer active market.

Active Competition — What We Have to Beat

Current active and pending inventory, comparable tier:

Within the subject's size band, active list prices run $399,900–$455,000 — but the only true apples-to-apples match is the no-view 2017 twin, and it is clearing at $399,900.

The Bellwether: The Near-Twin at 206 Cartwheel Bend #138

One active comp removes the guesswork — because it is, effectively, this unit.

Identical Profile

Same size (1,720 sf), same 2017 vintage, same builder era, same section, and the same no-view position.

The Hard Road to Contract

It went under contract at $399,900 — but only after cutting from $460,000 and sitting 123 days.

No Differentiator

There is no view differentiating the subject from it. If anything, the subject's yard condition is a point against, not for.

Pricing Strategy — The 25% Discipline

Our standard in this market: to sell efficiently, a home must be in the top 25% on presentation and the bottom 25% on price against the actives. Both levers, not one.

Recommended List Price

Yard cured: $399,900

Defensible range: $395,000–$409,000

Positioned $/sf: ~$230 — in line with the no-view twin, well below the view closings.


Presentation: As-is, the yard puts us in the bottom tier — and there is no view to compensate. New sod is what moves us into contention.

Price: The identical no-view twin is clearing at $399,900. With the yard cured we price alongside it; the yard issue means we cannot expect a premium over it.

Sod vs. Discount — The Net to Sally

The choice is not "spend money or don't." It is "spend a little now, or give away more at closing."

Path A: Cure the Yard

List ~$399,900. Expected close in the low-to-mid $390,000s. Sod cost is low single-thousands.


Path B: Sell As-Is

With a visibly distressed yard, no view, and a twin already at $399,900, we would price below the twin (~$385,000) and still absorb buyer repair credits — a net closer to the high-$370,000s.


Lease Analysis — The Parallel Track

If Sally prefers to hold, the lease market in this section is active and shallow on inventory.

Closed leases, subject size band:

The two identical-size closings bracket the range. The no-view twin leased at $3,350 — but a year ago; the most recent 1,736 sf closing (May 2026) came in at $2,845 as the market softened. Current market sits between.

Lease Recommendation
Yard Cured

$2,950/mo

Realistic for a no-view 1,736 sf unit in today's softer lease market, presented move-in ready.

As-Is

~$2,800/mo

Expect slower absorption; a barren yard reads poorly in listing photos even to tenants.

The same sod investment that protects the sale also protects lease velocity and rate. The improvement earns its cost on either track.

A Note on the HOA Matter

There is active litigation between the HOA and Village Builders regarding a handful of common-area items the builder is to address.

Disclosable

It is disclosable, and we will disclose it plainly.

Non-Obstructing

It does not obstruct a sale or a lease, and it is not specific to this unit.

Framed Factually

Common-area items in resolution — it is a non-event in the transaction. We will have the documentation ready so it never becomes a surprise mid-deal.

Recommendation Summary
01
Cure First

New sod before going live, on either track. With no view to lean on, presentation is what keeps us competitive. Advise Sally that a drainage correction is what makes it last.

02
If Selling

List at $399,900 (range $395,000–$409,000), anchored to the identical no-view twin. Do not price for a premium that the market no longer awards this unit.

03
If Leasing

List at $2,950/mo, cured.

04
Disclose the HOA Matter

Proactively and factually — documentation ready before launch so it is never a mid-deal surprise.

The section is competitive, buyers are pricing carefully, and this unit competes on condition and price rather than view. Disciplined entry pricing and clean presentation are how we protect Sally's position.

Next Steps
1
Confirm Direction

Sale or lease — and authorize the sod installation.

2
Drainage Assessment

Obtain a quick drainage assessment for the long-term fix and neighbor documentation.

3
HOA Documentation

Assemble the HOA/builder documentation for disclosure.

4
Launch Marketing

Finalize pricing and launch the full Foreman Property Group marketing program.


Foreman Property Group · eXp Realty Luxury

Concierge representation across Lakeway, Rough Hollow, Bee Cave, and Lake Travis.